![]() Second Life at one stage, offered and advertised the ability to "own virtual land", which was purchased for real money. However, Second Life has shown a legal example which may indicate that the developer can be in part held responsible for such losses. ![]() There is also some precedent for not letting developers get away with everything they like with respect to RMT. Taxation could also apply, though this would likely occur at the point of conversion via Paypal. One particular stance government(s) could take is to decide that Diablo III falls under gambling regulation, which there is reasonable support for. Moreover, it's a reasonably fluid form of currency, and it could even be used for things like money laundering. Basically, you're paying money for something that you have the ability to resell, though perhaps under some discretion from Blizzard. and don't expect to see solved quite yet.Your bank account is also effectively just "bits in a database" that argument doesn't hold up at all. since they're just switching a couple bits about which inventory slots out of all the inventory slots possesses a thing. Even without the EULA, the argument could be made that you're not actually "trading" anything.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |